state-of-mayflower-v-stevenmedvedeva

Mayflower District Court

#state-of-mayflower-v-stevenmedvedeva

This is the start of #state-of-mayflower-v-stevenmedvedeva channel.

DauuX 2024-11-19 05:07 p.m.

https://trello.com/c/ah6vVk05/245-state-of-mayflower-v-stevenmedvedeva

CASE INFORMATION**

IN THE MAYFLOWER DISTRICT COURT FOR CLARK COUNTY

---

CR-0036-24 State of Mayflower v. StevenMedvedeva

Trial Type: Criminal

Judge Assigned: Chief Judge AlbertWellesley - Courtroom 101

Complaint Link: Attached below

---

UPCOMING COURT DATES

‌

PAST COURT EVENTS**

```
‌11/16 - Filed...

Labels

Criminal, Felony

DauuX 2024-11-19 05:08 p.m.

@taxi

@Kezzera

taxi 2024-11-19 05:11 p.m.

Hello

taxi 2024-11-20 12:25 p.m.

@Kezzera

Summons?

taxi 2024-11-21 02:08 p.m.

@Kezzera

Doogy 2024-11-21 05:54 p.m.

@AdamC_2001

added. (i have no interest in this case and am just performing clerk duties)

taxi

@Kezzera hi

AdamC_2001 2024-11-21 06:00 p.m.

Hello

AdamC_2001 2024-11-22 05:08 p.m.

@Kezzera

Your Honor, defense would like to add insertreality as co-counsel

taxi 2024-11-23 08:04 a.m.

@DauuX

Can you reassign this

AdamC_2001 2024-11-23 02:00 p.m.

What for

AdamC_2001

What for

taxi 2024-11-23 07:32 p.m.

The judge isn’t doing anything

AdamC_2001 2024-11-23 08:11 p.m.

true

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:54 p.m.

hello, many apologies

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:54 p.m.

i am here now

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:55 p.m.

@AdamC_2001

can you have Mr. reality submit a NOA and DM me directly, or tag me in filing-center directly

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:55 p.m.

hold on

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:55 p.m.

@shah

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:56 p.m.

i can't take this case, present conflict of interest

Kezzera 2024-11-25 09:56 p.m.

i will have this re-assigned

taxi 2024-11-26 11:57 a.m.

@DauuX

honkhonk 2024-12-02 04:55 a.m.

I will reassign this

honkhonk 2024-12-02 05:06 a.m.

Honorable Judge @acerxtro assigned

acerxtro 2024-12-02 11:02 a.m.

Hello COI since we are in the same department @honkhonk

acerxtro 2024-12-02 11:03 a.m.

I will be recusing due to that

acerxtro 2024-12-02 11:03 a.m.

good luck @steven2596

AdamC_2001 2024-12-02 11:29 a.m.

Jesus

AdamC_2001 2024-12-02 11:29 a.m.

How many times

acerxtro

I will be recusing due to that

acerxtro 2024-12-04 01:12 a.m.

@honkhonk

honkhonk 2024-12-04 01:20 a.m.

I will reassign this

shah 2024-12-06 09:31 a.m.

@honkhonk

honkhonk 2024-12-06 03:31 p.m.

I shall be assigning this to Justice columbianethos

honkhonk 2024-12-06 03:32 p.m.

@morale

honkhonk 2024-12-06 03:51 p.m.

@shah

the original case channel...

morale 2024-12-06 03:52 p.m.

Hello all

polyrabies 2024-12-06 05:25 p.m.

CLERK ANNOUNCEMENT

Good Morning/Afternoon.

Welcome to the Chambers of the Honorable Associate Justice of the Supreme Court ColumbianEthos. My name is Polyrabies, and I will be assisting as the court clerk for this case. Before we begin, I would like to provide some important information and guidance to ensure everyone is prepared for the proceedings.

Courtroom Procedures

Please address the judge as “Your Honor” at all times.
Be respectful and courteous to all parties and participants in the courtroom.
Speaking and Timing:

Speak only when recognized by the judge to avoid interruptions.
Ensure all statements are clear and concise.
Document Submission:

If you need to submit evidence or motions, follow the guidelines provided in the chamber-information channel.
Attendance:

Be punctual for all scheduled sessions. Missing or late attendance may result in delays or court action.

You must abide by the rest of the Court Room Procedures within chamber-information enacted by Associate Justice ColumbianEthos.

If you have any immediate questions or need clarification on procedural matters, feel free to reach out to me. Please note that I cannot provide legal advice, but I’m happy to assist with any administrative inquiries.

Thank you for your cooperation, and I look forward to assisting you as we proceed with this case.

morale 2024-12-06 10:53 p.m.

@taxi

Draft Criminal Summonses.

morale 2024-12-07 01:35 a.m.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1an-6XS_Qs-2R--56YpcjqQNIQjqu_vAZzxDVzCI4frQ/edit?usp=sharing

ColumbianEthos Criminal Summons

DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF MAYFLOWER COUNTY OF CLARK STATE OF MAYFLOWER, Petitioner -against- [ROBLOX Username] (ROBLOX ID) AKA [Discord Username] (Discord ID) Defendant Case No. CR-XXXX-24 CRIMINAL SUMMONS Presiding...

morale 2024-12-07 01:35 a.m.

My template.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-07 04:14 p.m.

Who's the prosecutor for this

AdamC_2001 2024-12-07 04:15 p.m.

Defense is going to add a co-counsel to this criminal matter as well.

AdamC_2001

Who's the prosecutor for this

taxi 2024-12-10 01:59 p.m.

I am.

morale

@taxi Draft Criminal Summonses.

taxi 2024-12-10 01:59 p.m.

One moment please.

taxi 2024-12-10 02:04 p.m.

@morale

Submitted with court of clerk as well.

taxi

@morale Submitted with court of clerk as well.

morale 2024-12-10 02:12 p.m.

Approved please have @Honoripedia serve

taxi 2024-12-10 03:01 p.m.

@morale

morale 2024-12-10 03:07 p.m.

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-zKgeuJWTodJNCLBdWm7709uRluWPCyV8tTergi5bTw/edit?usp=sharing

Proof of Summons

morale 2024-12-10 03:07 p.m.

@taxi

AdamC_2001 2024-12-10 07:18 p.m.

@morale

Your Honor, my client wishes to be added to this channel

AdamC_2001 2024-12-10 07:20 p.m.

@honkhonk

Can you add steven to this please

morale 2024-12-10 07:22 p.m.

@AdamC_2001

he's added

AdamC_2001 2024-12-10 07:23 p.m.

thanks

morale

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-zKgeuJWTodJNCLBdWm7709uRluWPCyV8tTergi5bTw/edit?usp=sharing

taxi 2024-12-11 02:12 p.m.

morale 2024-12-11 02:49 p.m.

Thank You

morale 2024-12-11 02:49 p.m.

@taxi

@AdamC_2001

@steven2596

when are we available to arraign

taxi 2024-12-11 02:51 p.m.

Saturday?

steven2596 2024-12-11 03:11 p.m.

i'm abroad until the 16th of January so my availability is sporadic

morale 2024-12-11 05:09 p.m.

you're a broad?

morale 2024-12-11 05:09 p.m.

we call it being a women now, steven

morale 2024-12-11 05:09 p.m.

please get with the times

steven2596 2024-12-11 09:28 p.m.

apologies your honour im not caught up with all this woke speech

morale

@taxi

@AdamC_2001

@steven2596 when are we available to arraign

AdamC_2001 2024-12-11 09:37 p.m.

anytime

AdamC_2001 2024-12-11 09:37 p.m.

I can do it rn

AdamC_2001 2024-12-11 09:37 p.m.

@taxi

morale 2024-12-12 12:37 a.m.

I am forced to disclose a conflict of interest that has occured in this matter.

morale 2024-12-12 12:37 a.m.

I was mistakenly added to a group chat including the Defendant in this matter which, in part, contained material which pertained this case.

morale 2024-12-12 12:38 a.m.

While I did not view any material which would compromise my objectivity or impartiality in this matter, I do not feel that it would be right for me to continue given this.

morale 2024-12-12 12:38 a.m.

As such, I am recusing from this matter.

morale 2024-12-12 12:38 a.m.

@steven2596

@AdamC_2001

@taxi

morale 2024-12-12 12:38 a.m.

@honkhonk

Please re-assign.

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-12 01:05 a.m.

Re-assigned to Hon. AwesomePIays

Toby 2024-12-12 04:27 a.m.

@AdamC_2001

@taxi

Hello, please state availabilities for the arraignment

Toby 2024-12-12 10:32 a.m.

Let's get it arranged so we can go straight to arraignment after @Awesome has officially established probable cause

Toby

@AdamC_2001

@taxi Hello, please state availabilities for the arraignment

AdamC_2001 2024-12-12 05:08 p.m.

today works

Toby 2024-12-12 05:10 p.m.

@taxi

AdamC_2001

today works

Toby 2024-12-12 05:10 p.m.

What time period specifically

AdamC_2001 2024-12-12 05:17 p.m.

Anytime really

AdamC_2001 2024-12-12 05:17 p.m.

I'm off work today

Toby 2024-12-12 05:22 p.m.

Ok cool

Toby 2024-12-12 05:22 p.m.

We'll wait for operators response

Toby

Let's get it arranged so we can go straight to arraignment after @Awesome has officially established probable cause

Awesome 2024-12-12 06:13 p.m.

Probable cause was already found by the Riding Justice and I will not disturb that finding absent good cause.

Awesome 2024-12-12 06:13 p.m.

We will proceed.

morale

Click to see attachment.

Awesome 2024-12-12 06:19 p.m.

For reference.

Awesome

For reference.

Toby 2024-12-12 06:33 p.m.

Oh my apologise, I had not seen that minute order

taxi 2024-12-13 02:47 a.m.

I would do it today but my witness is unavailable

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 07:50 a.m.

It’s arraignment

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 07:50 a.m.

You don’t need a witness

Toby 2024-12-13 08:49 a.m.

@AdamC_2001

@taxi

can we do today?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 09:04 a.m.

Yes

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 09:05 a.m.

But it would have to be later this afternoon

Toby 2024-12-13 09:08 a.m.

@taxi

taxi 2024-12-13 09:11 a.m.

Time?

AdamC_2001

You don’t need a witness

taxi 2024-12-13 09:11 a.m.

Wrong chat

taxi 2024-12-13 09:11 a.m.

I got confused with the case chat

Toby 2024-12-13 09:11 a.m.

How does 5:15 p.m. sound?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 09:12 a.m.

Let’s push it to 6

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 09:12 a.m.

I get out of work for 5

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 09:12 a.m.

won’t be home till 5:30

Toby

How does 5:15 p.m. sound?

taxi 2024-12-13 04:18 p.m.

Sounds good to me

Toby 2024-12-13 04:24 p.m.

Great

Toby 2024-12-13 04:24 p.m.

@Awesome

We have a time

Toby 2024-12-13 04:24 p.m.

Are you available?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 04:40 p.m.

I said I can’t at 5:15

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 04:40 p.m.

What about 6

AdamC_2001

What about 6

Awesome 2024-12-13 05:06 p.m.

For the record, what timezone is this?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 05:30 p.m.

Est

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 05:31 p.m.

I’m driving Home

taxi 2024-12-13 05:47 p.m.

Texting and driving

taxi 2024-12-13 05:47 p.m.

@AdamC_2001

Is ur client going to be there

taxi 2024-12-13 05:47 p.m.

Fairly certain he has to be

taxi

Texting and driving

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 05:48 p.m.

yea i was texting your mother

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 05:48 p.m.

and yes im sure let me ask

taxi 2024-12-13 05:49 p.m.

My mother would not be texting the likes of you my good sir

taxi 2024-12-13 05:58 p.m.

@AdamC_2001

@Awesome

get in game?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:01 p.m.

can we do it via discord

taxi 2024-12-13 06:01 p.m.

why

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:01 p.m.

cause my client cant go in game

taxi 2024-12-13 06:01 p.m.

ugh

taxi 2024-12-13 06:01 p.m.

discord is just slow and boring

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:02 p.m.

unless u wanna do this another time it has to be discord

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:02 p.m.

and i dont want to delay these proceedings

taxi 2024-12-13 06:02 p.m.

discord it is ig

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:03 p.m.

trial can be done in game since my client does not need to be there

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:03 p.m.

if it goes that far

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:04 p.m.

@Awesome

ready whenever

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:08 p.m.

Are we all present?

cc: @AdamC_2001 @steven2596 / @taxi

taxi 2024-12-13 06:08 p.m.

Yes.

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:10 p.m.

For the record, the Court is now in session for the arraignment of Defendant StevenMedvedeva, in the above-captioned matter.

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:11 p.m.

@taxi

Please read the charges.

taxi 2024-12-13 06:13 p.m.

The defendant is charged with x1 count of Voluntary Manslaughter.

On or about the 8th of November 2024, at the Mersea Car Dealership, located in the City of Mersea, the defendant, StevenMedvedeva, in a sudden quarrel and the heat of the passion, shot and killed Dima_TopUA using a department issued Delino R21A Special.

taxi 2024-12-13 06:13 p.m.

@Awesome

@AdamC_2001

@steven2596

taxi

@Awesome

@AdamC_2001

@steven2596

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:14 p.m.

Thank you. @steven2596 Do you understand the nature of the charges levied against you?

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:15 p.m.

Yes, your honor

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:18 p.m.

Alright.

Constitutional Rights

- You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you.
- You have the right to be informed of the charges against you.
- You have the right to confront and cross-examine any witnesses who testify against you in this case.
- You have the right to present evidence in your defense and to call witnesses on your behalf.
- You have the right not to testify in your own case, without such being held or used against you.

Do you understand these rights as I have read them to you? @steven2596

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:18 p.m.

Yes your honor

steven2596

Yes your honor

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:21 p.m.

- You also have the right to have an attorney present during any questioning or legal proceedings. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be appointed for you at no cost.

I forgot to tack this on.

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:21 p.m.

Do you understand this, in addition?

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:22 p.m.

Yes, your honor

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:24 p.m.

Your Honor, my client is crunched for time.

steven2596

Yes, your honor

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:25 p.m.

Do you understand that, if you are convicted, you face up to twenty-five minutes of incarceration?

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:25 p.m.

Yes your honor(edited)

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:25 p.m.

With that in mind, how do you plead as to COUNT 1 - Voluntary Manslaughter?

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:25 p.m.

Not guilty

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:27 p.m.

Alright. The Court will thus enter accordingly. We are adjourned, unless either the prosecution or defense has any further questions.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:27 p.m.

I'm all set.

Awesome

Alright. The Court will thus enter accordingly. We are adjourned, unless either the prosecution or defense has any further questions.

taxi 2024-12-13 06:35 p.m.

Can we get confirmation from the defendant of his voluntary absence from trials?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:36 p.m.

he's currently on vacation it depends when trial begins

taxi

Can we get confirmation from the defendant of his voluntary absence from trials?

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:36 p.m.

I'm gone until the 16th of January

AdamC_2001

he's currently on vacation it depends when trial begins

Awesome 2024-12-13 06:36 p.m.

We will schedule around his vacation. The Court would rather the Defendant be physically present for his trial.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-13 06:37 p.m.

Sadly your honor i'm up for a nomination to the magistrate court so time on my end isnt very good either.

steven2596

I'm gone until the 16th of January

steven2596 2024-12-13 06:37 p.m.

no way of getting access to a computer until i get back home

taxi 2024-12-13 06:38 p.m.

Well this isn’t convenient

taxi 2024-12-14 09:58 a.m.

@Awesome

pretrial arrangements?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-14 10:04 a.m.

Yes please

AdamC_2001 2024-12-14 10:04 a.m.

I’ll submit my discovery later this weekend

AdamC_2001 2024-12-14 10:04 a.m.

Since I’m going to New York

taxi

@Awesome pretrial arrangements?

Awesome 2024-12-16 02:02 a.m.

The Court will publish a pre-trial schedule shortly.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-18 10:12 a.m.

When

AdamC_2001 2024-12-18 10:15 a.m.

@Awesome

AdamC_2001

@Awesome

Awesome 2024-12-18 10:46 a.m.

I’m hoping to get it out sometime today. Apologies for the delay, I’ve been rather busy IRL in the run-up to Christmas.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-18 11:03 a.m.

No worries

Awesome 2024-12-19 01:20 p.m.

PAPERLESS ORDER GOVERNING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay:
- (1) the pre-trial window will close Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 5 months ago;
- (2) in accordance with Mayfl. D. Ct. 3(8), pre-trial motions will be due forty-eight (48) hours prior to the close of the pretrial window;
- (3) a pre-trial conference is scheduled for Monday, January 20, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 5 months ago, prior to which the parties shall disclose a draft of the exhibits and witnesses, if any, that they intend to rely on;
- (4) on or before Monday, January 20, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 5 months ago, the State shall disclose to the defense any undisclosed material deemed exculpatory or potentially exculpatory — that is, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case — pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963);
- The State is reminded that this obligation is continuing in nature, as per Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39, 60 (1987), and failure to disclose Brady material in a timely manner may incur consequences, including, but not limited to, exclusion of evidence, dismissal of the information, and sanctions;
- (5) motions in limine are due seventy-two (72) hours prior to trial, with any oppositions due twenty-four (24) hours thereafter; and
- (6) trial briefs, if any, are due forty-eight (48) hours prior to trial.

/s/ AwesomePIays

Mayflower District Judge

cc: @steven2596 @AdamC_2001 / @taxi

(edited)

Awesome

PAPERLESS ORDER GOVERNING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay: - (1) the pre-trial window will clo...(edited)

Awesome 2024-12-19 01:25 p.m.

For the record, these timelines revolve around the Defendant's stated absence until Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m., 6 months ago.

Awesome

For the record, these timelines revolve around the Defendant's stated absence until Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m., 6 months ago.

steven2596 2024-12-19 08:21 p.m.

Just to make you aware your honor even when I am back my availability is still going to be spotty. I work 6 days in a row off for 3 then back on for 6. I've not received the dates of which I will be starting back at work.

steven2596

Just to make you aware your honor even when I am back my availability is still going to be spotty. I work 6 days in a row off for 3 then back on for 6. I've not received the dates ...

Awesome 2024-12-20 08:10 a.m.

The timelines are flexible; let me know once you’re aware of your schedule.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 10:58 a.m.

Surly we won’t be forced to wait a long month for the state to prepare it ls case? No? My client wants to get this over with and not take months to do like some other people unfortunately had to do

AdamC_2001

Surly we won’t be forced to wait a long month for the state to prepare it ls case? No? My client wants to get this over with and not take months to do like some other people unfort...

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:01 p.m.

I'm sorry?

For the record, these timelines revolve around the Defendant's stated absence until Wednesday, January 15, 2025 at 9:00 a.m., 6 months ago.

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:02 p.m.

As I have stated prior, the Court would prefer if the Defendant was, himself, able to be present for these proceedings.

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:31 p.m.

*it if

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:41 p.m.

The defendant isn’t legally required to attend and his vacation will be well over before that

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:41 p.m.

Plus I wasn’t referring to you

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:41 p.m.

I was talking to the SA

AdamC_2001

I was talking to the SA

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:41 p.m.

Ah, alright.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:42 p.m.

He only really needs to be here for sentencing and arraignment

AdamC_2001

The defendant isn’t legally required to attend and his vacation will be well over before that

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:42 p.m.

Well, not exactly; your client can waive his appearance, with the permission of the Court, but I would prefer, as I have stated prior, for him to attend the entirety of the trial itself, given this is a criminal matter.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:43 p.m.

Given my client is from England the time zone difference is a major effect especially for him since he’s in college but I understand

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:44 p.m.

At least I think he’s from England

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:44 p.m.

lol

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:44 p.m.

He’s definitely European

AdamC_2001

lol

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:45 p.m.

Those deadlines above are exactly that -- deadlines. If you both wish to have this hammered out before then, by all means.

Awesome 2024-12-20 03:45 p.m.

The only non-deadline is a pre-trial conference, which is scheduled for Monday, January 20, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 5 months ago.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-20 03:46 p.m.

Yeah I attend to it’s just I don’t like the idea of people waiting months to have this over I have a previous client who’s still in waiting since September

AdamC_2001

At least I think he’s from England

steven2596 2024-12-22 07:54 p.m.

Scotland*

steven2596 2024-12-22 07:54 p.m.

I'd rather not attend. One less person to schedule around considering how often I work

AdamC_2001 2024-12-22 08:04 p.m.

oh mb then scotland

steven2596

Scotland*

Toby 2024-12-23 05:16 p.m.

Same

steven2596

I'd rather not attend. One less person to schedule around considering how often I work

Awesome 2024-12-24 07:37 p.m.

Hm, in that case:

AMENDED PAPERLESS ORDER GOVERNING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay:
- (1) Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 5 months ago is struck and, in lieu thereof, Friday, January 3, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 6 months ago is inserted; the pre-trial window will now close Friday, January 3, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 6 months ago;
- (2) Monday, January 20, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 5 months ago is struck and, in lieu thererof, Wednesday, January 1, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 6 months ago is inserted; a pre-trial conference is now scheduled Wednesday, January 1, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 6 months ago, prior to or on which (1) the parties shall disclose a draft of the exhibits and witnesses, if any, that they intend to rely on; and (2) the prosecution shall disclose to the defense any undisclosed material deemed exculpatory or potentially exculpatory — that is, evidence that favors the defendant or casts doubt on the State's case — pursuant to Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); and
- (3) all remaining provisions of the Court's order, which do not conflict with this amended order, remain in effect.

/s/ AwesomePIays

Mayflower District Judge

cc: @steven2596 @AdamC_2001 / @taxi

(edited)

Awesome 2024-12-24 07:42 p.m.

If there any objections concerning this amended order, please notify me promptly.

Awesome

Hm, in that case: AMENDED PAPERLESS ORDER GOVERNING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay: - (1) <t...(edited)

AdamC_2001 2024-12-26 01:12 p.m.

I'll have my discovery in later today if that's alright with the court.

AdamC_2001

I'll have my discovery in later today if that's alright with the court.

Awesome 2024-12-26 01:17 p.m.

That’s fine.

taxi 2024-12-27 04:21 p.m.

Case being handed over to @JaroCycle

Awesome 2024-12-27 04:24 p.m.

@JaroCycle

please file a Notice of Appearance.

Awesome 2024-12-27 04:24 p.m.

@JaroCycle

has been added.

Awesome

@JaroCycle please file a Notice of Appearance.

JaroCycle 2024-12-27 04:43 p.m.

Will do.

JaroCycle 2024-12-27 05:37 p.m.

@Awesome

AdamC_2001 2024-12-27 06:40 p.m.

@Awesome

Your Honor, The defense requests the court not extend this pretrial as my client has been waiting for a long time to get this started and the failure of the State to keep an attorney on this case shouldn't be a reason to kick the right to a speedy trial out the window.

AdamC_2001

@Awesome Your Honor, The defense requests the court not extend this pretrial as my client has been waiting for a long time to get this started and the failure of the S...

Awesome 2024-12-27 06:40 p.m.

Has such a request been made, or is that merely anticipatory?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-27 06:41 p.m.

anticipatry if the state wishes to extend to play catch up.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-27 06:41 p.m.

anticipatory*

AdamC_2001 2024-12-27 06:53 p.m.

DEFENSE DISCOVERY

CC: @taxi

@Awesome

AdamC_2001 2024-12-27 06:53 p.m.

@JaroCycle

AdamC_2001 2024-12-27 06:53 p.m.

my bad

AdamC_2001

my bad

Awesome 2024-12-27 11:59 p.m.

Alright.

JaroCycle 2024-12-28 05:28 a.m.

STATE'S DISCOVERY

CC: @Awesome

@AdamC_2001

Awesome

Hm, in that case: AMENDED PAPERLESS ORDER GOVERNING PRETRIAL AND DISCOVERY IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, barring extension for good cause or other unforeseen delay: - (1) <t...(edited)

JaroCycle 2024-12-28 01:27 p.m.

Your Honor, I request that the pre-trial conference to be schedule not on the first of january but on the second if that's alright, due to the fact that I won't be able to attend anything at all on 1st of January, and other than that the State does not wish to extend pretrial.

JaroCycle

Your Honor, I request that the pre-trial conference to be schedule not on the first of january but on the second if that's alright, due to the fact that I won't be able to attend a...

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:16 p.m.

@AdamC_2001

Is there an objection?

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:17 p.m.

If not, I’ll so order.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:17 p.m.

Yeah second of January is fine i'll probable be recovering from the new years eve party I'm going to

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:17 p.m.

probably

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:20 p.m.

Alright, so ordered; the pre-trial conference is now scheduled Thursday, January 2, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 6 months ago.

cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

(edited)

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:21 p.m.

you mean the second

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:21 p.m.

I put the wrong date in, because I forgot to factor in the timezone. 1s

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:21 p.m.

fixed.

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:21 p.m.

Okay

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:22 p.m.

I do not want to end pretrial

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:22 p.m.

I object to that

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:22 p.m.

I believe something is in the works and if it does not pan out ill inform the court.

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:22 p.m.

They’re not requesting to extend pre-trial, just the conference?

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:22 p.m.

Oh my bad I got ahead of myself

AdamC_2001 2024-12-28 03:23 p.m.

I'm tryna do like 2 things at once sorry

Awesome 2024-12-28 03:23 p.m.

It’s fine. So we’ll do the pre-trial conference 1 day prior to the end of pretrial, in that case.

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2024-12-28 09:54 p.m.

@JaroCycle

has been added for the State

JaroCycle

STATE'S DISCOVERY CC: @Awesome

@AdamC_2001

Awesome 2024-12-29 04:23 a.m.

And this is all discoverable material (including that which is exculpatory), to date, in the State’s possession, correct?(edited)

Awesome

And this is all discoverable material (including that which is exculpatory), to date, in the State’s possession, correct?(edited)

JaroCycle 2024-12-29 04:27 a.m.

Affirm

JaroCycle 2024-12-29 04:28 a.m.

All of the evidence that is included in discovery was submitted with AOPC.

JaroCycle

Affirm

Awesome 2024-12-29 04:29 a.m.

Alright, we’ll schedule the trial date during the pre-trial conference (we’ll need to work out a time during which the parties, the Court, and the witnesses are available).

JaroCycle 2024-12-29 04:31 a.m.

Would the court be willing to do witness hearings on discord, or accept sworn affidavits from them?

Awesome 2024-12-29 04:31 a.m.

For the Court’s benefit, does the State or the defense plan to, at this time, file any pre-trial motions?

cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

(edited)

JaroCycle 2024-12-29 04:31 a.m.

Not from the State.

Awesome

For the Court’s benefit, does the State or the defense plan to, at this time, file any pre-trial motions? cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle(edited)

Awesome 2024-12-29 04:31 a.m.

*Plan to, as in, either now or before the deadline.

JaroCycle

Would the court be willing to do witness hearings on discord, or accept sworn affidavits from them?

Awesome 2024-12-29 04:37 a.m.

They'll need to be present, even if it's not all done in one session, so that the respective parties may directly/cross examine them.

JaroCycle 2024-12-29 04:37 a.m.

Alright.

Awesome 2025-01-02 04:20 a.m.

Are we still on for Thursday, January 2, 2025 at 1:20 p.m., 6 months ago?

cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 04:52 a.m.

Affirm.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 06:30 a.m.

No….im at work i never agreed to 1:20pm

AdamC_2001

No….im at work i never agreed to 1:20pm

Awesome 2025-01-02 06:54 a.m.

You never lodged an objection with the Court? Nonetheless, I’ll adjust the time to where you’re available. Does Thursday, January 2, 2025 at 5:20 p.m., 6 months ago, work?

cc: @JaroCycle

(edited)

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:02 a.m.

Not perfect, but alright

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:13 a.m.

6 works better

AdamC_2001

6 works better

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:35 a.m.

Ok. @JaroCycle, what about you?(edited)

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:36 a.m.

No, cause it's midnight for me.

Awesome

You never lodged an objection with the Court? Nonetheless, I’ll adjust the time to where you’re available. Does Thursday, January 2, 2025 at 5:20 p.m., 6 months ago, work? cc: <@35056736653239910...(edited)

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:36 a.m.

And respectfully the time presented now is 23:20 for me,

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:37 a.m.

The Defense had plenty of time to object to the scheduling, as it was already agreed on 28th of December.

Awesome

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:38 a.m.

We either do it at this time, or not today at all.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:38 a.m.

I got a lot of personal stuff going on so excuse me I don’t check discord 23/7

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:39 a.m.

I get out of work today at 5pm I would still be driving home so

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:39 a.m.

take it as you will

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:42 a.m.

I can try but no guarantees

JaroCycle

We either do it at this time, or not today at all.

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:47 a.m.

Alright, we’ll try then.

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:50 a.m.

It's pre-trial conference, so I doubt it will take long,

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:50 a.m.

So even if you would be late, we can wait.

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 07:50 a.m.

But after 6 like I said, it's bed time for me.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:52 a.m.

How long do you think it could take

AdamC_2001

I can try but no guarantees

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:52 a.m.

And, counsellor, for future reference, when I set a date several days in advance, and moreover you agree to the State’s request to push such forward by a day, I expect you to either show up or timely raise an objection.(edited)

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:52 a.m.

It shouldn’t take long.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:53 a.m.

You never set a time until 4am

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:53 a.m.

How was I supposed to know when we were doing it on the 2nd

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:54 a.m.

Plus like I said I got some stuff going on that will hinder my ability to be on for a little while

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:55 a.m.

Oh now I’m just seeing it nvm

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 07:55 a.m.

I can manage should be alright

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:56 a.m.

It’s fine, but for the future please raise an objection to the date & time in advance rather than raising one mere hours beforehand.

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:58 a.m.

@AdamC_2001

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:13 p.m.

Driving home now

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:19 p.m.

Sounds great,

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:19 p.m.

@Awesome

Are you ready, Your Honor

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:29 p.m.

Yeah im ready

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:29 p.m.

@Awesome

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:29 p.m.

Lol

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:29 p.m.

If he isn't here this is actually gonna be hilarious

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:30 p.m.

game or discord

JaroCycle

If he isn't here this is actually gonna be hilarious

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:30 p.m.

whos ur expert witness btw

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:30 p.m.

whats his qualifications

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:30 p.m.

Lead investigator for MPD

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:31 p.m.

mersea police

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:31 p.m.

when my client is port

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:31 p.m.

is he even aware of the siutation

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:31 p.m.

situation

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:31 p.m.

Adam, he is the one who made the exhibit J, K pictures

AdamC_2001

is he even aware of the siutation

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:32 p.m.

He is

JaroCycle

Adam, he is the one who made the exhibit J, K pictures

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:32 p.m.

I, J *

AdamC_2001

when my client is port

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:33 p.m.

That's also another thing, what was port doing in Mersea

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:33 p.m.

is it still pretrial

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

i got a million things going on rn

AdamC_2001

is it still pretrial

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

Yea,

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

good

AdamC_2001

i got a million things going on rn

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

I know the pain

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

The sheer fact that we both got thrown into another case which is already in trial

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

And we both weren't present during pre-trial period

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

someone in my family died

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

so its more of a personal level

AdamC_2001

someone in my family died

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

Oh,

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:34 p.m.

I see,

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:35 p.m.

My condolences then

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:35 p.m.

hence why i wasnt on discord 24/7

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 05:35 p.m.

I think it's fair to asume Awesome ain't gonna show up

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:37 p.m.

He better

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:37 p.m.

I sped home for this

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:37 p.m.

imagine telling a real cop im late for lego court

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 05:38 p.m.

@Awesome

wake up

AdamC_2001

imagine telling a real cop im late for lego court

JaroCycle 2025-01-02 06:19 p.m.

Lol

AdamC_2001

@Awesome wake up

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:44 p.m.

I sincerely apologize; for some reason, my alarm that I set didn’t go off.(edited)

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:48 p.m.

In light of the circumstances, we’ll just do it now, and you both can just respond whenever you’re on.(edited)

Awesome 2025-01-02 07:55 p.m.

@JaroCycle

@AdamC_2001

As there are no outstanding motions (and all pre-trial motions were due as of 24h ago), are there any objections, at this time, to any of the witnesses planned to be called?(edited)

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:16 p.m.

I object to some evidence being called but since I had some family issues going on didnt get time to draft a motion.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:16 p.m.

But I can just orally do it if you want.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:16 p.m.

@Awesome

AdamC_2001

@Awesome

Awesome 2025-01-02 08:17 p.m.

I’d rather it be submitted in writing, but if you could provide an outline as to what you’re objecting to, that’d be helpful.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:18 p.m.

Supress evidence due to the best evidence rule, Your Honor.

Awesome 2025-01-02 08:18 p.m.

I mean, what evidence you’re objecting to.*

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:18 p.m.

Ah,

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:18 p.m.

Exhibit G H I and K

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:19 p.m.

And Exhibit J due to relevance

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:21 p.m.

Due to the sections of evidence clearly edited and altered from the original screenshot I ask to supress such evidence.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:21 p.m.

And for J realavance due to having no standing ground for this case.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:22 p.m.

I know I'm past and I never usally miss a deadline but like I said before a family member died which was my aunt so the past few days been real whacky for my family. Sorry in advance.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:22 p.m.

usually*

Awesome 2025-01-02 08:24 p.m.

You’re good. Hm, given the contested exhibits are only screenshots (and the objections themselves are relatively straightforward), I’ll allow an oral motion to exclude such to be made, and I’ll await the State’s response.

cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

(edited)

AdamC_2001 2025-01-02 08:25 p.m.

Thank You, Your Honor. I appreciate it I won't miss another deadline

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 07:04 a.m.

Exhibit G - Is a picture taken from the original video, simply to highlit where the defendant was at the beginning of the whole interaction that took place at mersea car delear. It is not edited, nor does put the defendant in a wrong light, it is put there to allow better analises of the whole video, which is presented in the Exhibit A. And per the best evidence, the original is in fact provided, which makes the whole objection without basis, as like I said this is only to allow better view on the situation, and the highlighting where the defendant was when the situation on Exhibit A begins.

Exhibit H - Same as Exhibit G, it only highlights the moment of the entire situation, where the defendant is, and serves to support the claim, of where the defendant was, and that he could in fact see the entire situation, before making the decisions that led to a tragic death. Like I mentioned regarding Exhibit G, the entire video is presented in Exhibit A, and exhibit H serves as a highlight to allow better presentation of facts that are already stated and accepted by both sides.

Exhibit I - This is a picture taken by the investigator, to show the view of the defendant that he has while entering the area, in which the scene presented in Exhibit A takes place. It's absurd to object to this with the best evidence rule, considering this is entire pov of the investigator, and literally is not editited nor tampered with in any way. Again, this exhibit will be backed up by the expert witness statement, and other lay witnesses, so to object to this as to best evidence has absolutely no grounds.

Exhibit K - Again this is a picture taken by the investigator, to show the possible POV of the defendant, when the situation takes place, and this is relevant to the case, as to proof whether the defendant could see the entire situation that took prior to his decision to shoot the victim, and will be further supported by witness statements.

CC: @Awesome

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:08 a.m.

It’s not an original screenshot

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:08 a.m.

It’s edited

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:08 a.m.

Previous cases in the past have denied evidence due to such violations

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:09 a.m.

And in your exhibit A shows a pink van blocking the directly angle of these alleged crimes

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:10 a.m.

So your screenshots of my clients POV is obstructed and therefore being not relevant to this case due to your investigator had no such obstruction

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:10 a.m.

Best evidence rule directly says original documents not edited ones

AdamC_2001

So your screenshots of my clients POV is obstructed and therefore being not relevant to this case due to your investigator had no such obstruction

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 09:12 a.m.

This didn’t make a lot of sense what I mean is my client had a pink van in the way of the situation and was blocked your investigator had no such obstruction in the way. I see no standing reason why that should be admitted as it’s clearly a different circumstance

Awesome 2025-01-03 10:33 a.m.

Hm… After reviewing the parties’ arguments, I’m having a hard time seeing how the best evidence rule, which only “[says] that a party seeking to prove the contents of a document must introduce the original document,” United States v. Boley, 730 F.2d 1326, 1332–33 (10th Cir. 1984), could possibly apply here, given (1) the original was introduced, and (2) it has been long held that duplicates are admissible to the same extent as originals, unless there is a reason to doubt the authenticity of the duplicates.

cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

(edited)

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:42 a.m.

If he can get the original documents

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:42 a.m.

And has then the copies are inadmissible

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:44 a.m.

See Commonwealth v. Ocasio, 434 Mass. 1, 6 (2001), where the court explained as follows: "The best evidence rule provides that, where the contents of a document are to be proved, the party must either produce the original or show a sufficient excuse for its nonproduction.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:49 a.m.

Also Federal Rules of Evidence 1002

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:52 a.m.

Also see Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109 (1943) US Supreme Court Held that the documents are not admissible in court if an original copy exists

AdamC_2001

Also see Palmer v. Hoffman, 318 U.S. 109 (1943) US Supreme Court Held that the documents are not admissible in court if an original copy exists

Awesome 2025-01-03 10:55 a.m.

..? To the best of my knowledge, Palmer had nothing to do with the best evidence rule and, in fact, the phrase is not mentioned once throughout.

Awesome 2025-01-03 10:55 a.m.

Where are you getting this?

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:58 a.m.

We I copied the wrong one

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:58 a.m.

Er*

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:58 a.m.

Yikes

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:58 a.m.

that’s embarrassing

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:58 a.m.

either way federal rules of evidence states such

Awesome

Hm… After reviewing the parties’ arguments, I’m having a hard time seeing how the best evidence rule, which only “[says] that a party seeking to prove the contents of a document mu...(edited)

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 10:58 a.m.

As you stated your honor, the original is introduced and per United States v. Boley it is fine for it to be there. There is no doubt about authenticity of the duplicates as well.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:59 a.m.

You have edited marks on your evidence

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 10:59 a.m.

those red lines

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:00 a.m.

you got the OG then I can’t complain

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:00 a.m.

They only highlight what can be seen at the original video in Exhibit A.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:00 a.m.

I’m nkt talking about your exhibit A

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:00 a.m.

not

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:00 a.m.

A is fine

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:00 a.m.

I’m referring to your screenshots

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:01 a.m.

I listed them before

Awesome

..? To the best of my knowledge, Palmer had nothing to do with the best evidence rule and, in fact, the phrase is not mentioned once throughout.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:01 a.m.

My apologies I copied the wrong case law I’ll strike that from the record and I won’t bother again the website is used sucks

AdamC_2001

Er*

Awesome 2025-01-03 11:01 a.m.

What were you trying to copy?

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:01 a.m.

I used

AdamC_2001

I’m referring to your screenshots

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:03 a.m.

I am defending said screenshots, with the simplicty that it again highlights what it is in the original footage, they don't create any false claim, or anything like that. It's to allow better analyse of the video, and like I said in my response to your objections, they are original, they are also what was submitted in the AOPC, and will be backed up by the expert witness.

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:03 a.m.

Best evidence rule cannot apply here,

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:04 a.m.

Cause it literally is still the same evidence, just deeper analyze of it.

AdamC_2001

So your screenshots of my clients POV is obstructed and therefore being not relevant to this case due to your investigator had no such obstruction

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:06 a.m.

As for this, the picture is literally taken from a place that your client had no obstruction, and it was made on purpose to highlight that in fact he was able to see what was going on at the mersea car delear.

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:07 a.m.

Respectfully, if the defense wanted to strike the evidence, there was plenty of time to do it, special circumstances of Adam's personal issues, but nonetheless this isn't straightforward.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:10 a.m.

I have an expert that can attest to that claim he could see everything

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:10 a.m.

and the defendant

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:10 a.m.

Then leave it for trial period,

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:10 a.m.

Not pre-trial.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:10 a.m.

It is good to bring it up pre trial on a evidence based objection

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:10 a.m.

that’s the point

Awesome 2025-01-03 11:11 a.m.

I mean, even if I were to read the rule as to bar the admission of a secondary document where the original exists (where such is being used to prove the contents, and not merely to illustrate a point), the screenshots of the video would arguably still be duplicates, which are admissible to the same extent, unless there is a reason to doubt their authenticity.(edited)

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:11 a.m.

Fair enough I’ll leave it for trial

Awesome

I mean, even if I were to read the rule as to bar the admission of a secondary document where the original exists (where such is being used to prove the contents, and not merely to...(edited)

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:11 a.m.

And there is no reason to doubt their authenticity,

AdamC_2001

Fair enough I’ll leave it for trial

Awesome 2025-01-03 11:22 a.m.

Well, motions in limine are due 72h prior to trial.

JaroCycle 2025-01-03 11:24 a.m.

@Awesome

@AdamC_2001

Since we are past pre-trial, what would your times be ideal for the trial?

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:25 a.m.

I’d have to contact my witness and client

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 11:25 a.m.

To get a time their both able

Awesome

I sincerely apologize; for some reason, my alarm that I set didn’t go off.(edited)

AdamC_2001 2025-01-03 04:25 p.m.

We doing it today?

AdamC_2001

We doing it today?

Awesome 2025-01-03 11:14 p.m.

In light of the circumstances, we’ll just do it now, and you both can just respond whenever you’re on.

Awesome 2025-01-03 11:17 p.m.

With that out of the way, have the parties had sufficient time to prepare for trial? If so, what date/times would be ideal?

cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

Awesome

With that out of the way, have the parties had sufficient time to prepare for trial? If so, what date/times would be ideal? cc: @AdamC_2001 / @JaroCycle

AdamC_2001 2025-01-04 02:17 p.m.

My client is still on vacation overseas and won’t be able to return until the 16th of January BUT he is able to answer questions and give testimony over discord

AdamC_2001

My client is still on vacation overseas and won’t be able to return until the 16th of January BUT he is able to answer questions and give testimony over discord

Awesome 2025-01-05 04:47 a.m.

Hm, ok. I’ll post a trial date shortly.

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 10:24 a.m.

@Awesome

@AdamC_2001

Well, when are we up for trial?

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 10:24 a.m.

After 16th?

AdamC_2001 2025-01-09 11:42 a.m.

We can do your first half

AdamC_2001 2025-01-09 11:42 a.m.

Whenever

AdamC_2001 2025-01-09 11:42 a.m.

@JaroCycle

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 11:53 a.m.

I am up for this whenever the judge is available but preferably after 14

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 11:53 a.m.

Cause I have exam

JaroCycle

Cause I have exam

Awesome 2025-01-09 11:59 a.m.

We can do 16th or 17th.

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 12:00 p.m.

16th is fine with me

Awesome 2025-01-09 12:01 p.m.

We’ll do continuous, so y’all can just respond whenever you’re available (when we’re in session, that is).

JaroCycle

16th is fine with me

Awesome 2025-01-09 12:01 p.m.

And @AdamC_2001?

Awesome

We’ll do continuous, so y’all can just respond whenever you’re available (when we’re in session, that is).

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 12:02 p.m.

Alright.

Awesome

And @AdamC_2001?

AdamC_2001 2025-01-09 12:05 p.m.

That’s fine as long as it’s past 6pm est

AdamC_2001

That’s fine as long as it’s past 6pm est

Awesome 2025-01-09 12:05 p.m.

Alright, that works.

AdamC_2001 2025-01-09 03:43 p.m.

We can do the states side of the case

AdamC_2001 2025-01-09 03:43 p.m.

And maybe our side at a different time

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 04:26 p.m.

I rather we do everything on the same time

JaroCycle 2025-01-09 04:26 p.m.

To keep things fair

AdamC_2001 2025-01-10 11:53 a.m.

Then we’re unable to do it on the 16th as my client informed me he’s gonna be on a plane home back to his country and it’s a long flight

AdamC_2001 2025-01-10 11:53 a.m.

so he will be sleeping

AdamC_2001 2025-01-10 11:53 a.m.

maybe the 18th it’s a Saturday

AdamC_2001 2025-01-10 11:59 a.m.

@JaroCycle

JaroCycle 2025-01-10 11:59 a.m.

Sure

AdamC_2001

maybe the 18th it’s a Saturday

Awesome 2025-01-11 12:38 a.m.

Ok, we can do the 18th.

Toby 2025-01-13 04:59 p.m.

CLERICAL NOTICE

@Deleted User has been added and is asked to file a Notice of Appearance.

Deleted User 2025-01-13 05:02 p.m.

Deleted User 2025-01-13 05:03 p.m.

Filed in the appropriate channel as well

Toby 2025-01-13 05:03 p.m.

Thank you

Awesome

Ok, we can do the 18th.

Deleted User 2025-01-13 05:04 p.m.

Just confirming, this will be a virtual trial, correct?

Deleted User 2025-01-13 05:32 p.m.

@Toby

Mr Clerk, just confirming, is the Discovery filing listed in the trello card the updated doc? The one not containing the struck exhibits? Just trying to make sure I’m operating off the current stuff

Deleted User

@Toby Mr Clerk, just confirming, is the Discovery filing listed in the trello card the updated doc? The one not containing the struck exhibits? Just trying to make...

Deleted User 2025-01-13 05:33 p.m.

Disregard this, the former attorney on this case is a retard and told me incorrect information

Toby 2025-01-13 05:33 p.m.

No worries

Toby pinned a message to this channel.2025-06-21 08:39 p.m.

Deleted User

Filed in the appropriate channel as well

Awesome 2025-01-13 05:53 p.m.

Counsel of Record.. for the State?

Awesome 2025-01-13 05:53 p.m.

Please re-file, assuming you are substituting for @AdamC_2001; also, the court is incorrect.(edited)

Awesome

Counsel of Record.. for the State?

Deleted User 2025-01-13 06:01 p.m.

It’s a clerical error, should fall under an exception rule I think. But if you would like I’ll re file after dinner

Deleted User

It’s a clerical error, should fall under an exception rule I think. But if you would like I’ll re file after dinner

Awesome 2025-01-13 06:07 p.m.

If it were just that, it’d be fine, but it also lists the wrong court.

JaroCycle 2025-01-13 06:10 p.m.

Lmfao.

Deleted User 2025-01-13 06:29 p.m.

Yalllllll

Deleted User 2025-01-13 06:30 p.m.

Yall know I just pulled a template

Deleted User 2025-01-13 06:30 p.m.

I’ll re file later

Deleted User 2025-01-13 06:30 p.m.

I’ll blame my college legal intern who I only hired because of their oooks

Deleted User 2025-01-13 06:30 p.m.

Looks

Deleted User 2025-01-13 09:59 p.m.

i present, the amended document! god bless clark

Deleted User

Just confirming, this will be a virtual trial, correct?

Deleted User 2025-01-15 01:03 p.m.

@Awesome

Deleted User

@Awesome

Awesome 2025-01-15 04:58 p.m.

Affirm. Apologies for the delay in responding; I recently got a new monitor, and have been getting used to it.

Awesome

Affirm. Apologies for the delay in responding; I recently got a new monitor, and have been getting used to it.

Deleted User 2025-01-15 05:15 p.m.

Sounds good. I want to make the court aware that my client is unable to return to the country on the 18th. He was diagnosed with RSV and cannot travel. So, I’d like to push back our trial date. The earliest I can do is the 25th. My client has a work schedule, so weekends are preferable.

Deleted User

Sounds good. I want to make the court aware that my client is unable to return to the country on the 18th. He was diagnosed with RSV and cannot travel. So, I’d like to push back ou...

Awesome 2025-01-15 05:20 p.m.

Alright, we can do the 25th, but we need to get this show on the road.

Awesome 2025-01-15 05:21 p.m.

*soon.

Awesome

Alright, we can do the 25th, but we need to get this show on the road.

Deleted User 2025-01-15 05:21 p.m.

I agree. I just got notified 20 minutes ago about his diagnosis.

Awesome 2025-01-20 08:15 a.m.

@Deleted User

Are you and your client still good for the 25th?

Awesome

@Deleted User Are you and your client still good for the 25th?

Deleted User 2025-01-20 09:42 a.m.

To my knowledge yes

Deleted User

To my knowledge yes

Awesome 2025-01-20 07:59 p.m.

Alright, ideally, you’ll give at least forty-eight (48) hours of notice if that changes, absent exigent circumstances.

Awesome

Alright, ideally, you’ll give at least forty-eight (48) hours of notice if that changes, absent exigent circumstances.

Deleted User 2025-01-20 08:12 p.m.

Of course. My understanding is that he is currently in transit to return to the US

steven2596 2025-01-22 05:22 a.m.

to the uk*

steven2596 2025-01-22 05:22 a.m.

unfortunately

Awesome 2025-01-23 11:17 a.m.

@Deleted User

Are we still set for the 25th?

Awesome

@Deleted User Are we still set for the 25th?

Deleted User 2025-01-23 11:58 a.m.

Yes, what time do we want to start

Awesome

@Deleted User Are we still set for the 25th?

Awesome 2025-01-24 03:12 a.m.

@JaroCycle

Deleted User

Yes, what time do we want to start

Awesome 2025-01-24 03:12 a.m.

I’ll wait to make sure Jaro is also available.

Awesome

@JaroCycle

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 04:29 a.m.

Yes,

Awesome 2025-01-24 11:21 a.m.

@JaroCycle

@Deleted User

Does Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. (4 PM EST) work?(edited)

Awesome

@JaroCycle

@Deleted User Does Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. (4 PM EST) work?(edited)

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:21 a.m.

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:22 a.m.

You sure you put the correct,

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:22 a.m.

Time convert,

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:22 a.m.

Cause it shows 23:00

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:22 a.m.

For me

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:22 a.m.

Just ensuring that we are on the same page,

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 11:22 a.m.

@Awesome

JaroCycle

@Awesome

Awesome 2025-01-24 12:21 p.m.

Corrected; the converter didn’t subtract an hour.

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 12:21 p.m.

Alright,

Awesome

@JaroCycle

@Deleted User Does Saturday, January 25, 2025 at 4:00 p.m. (4 PM EST) work?(edited)

Awesome 2025-01-24 02:01 p.m.

@Deleted User

Deleted User 2025-01-24 02:02 p.m.

Yes it should. I want to note, I’m on-shift at the fire department that day. However our work period ends at 2 on Saturdays. The only reason there will be a pause, is if I have to go on a call. If that’s the case, it’s as simple as a 30 minute break in chat, until I return.

Deleted User 2025-01-24 02:02 p.m.

@Awesome

Deleted User

@Awesome

Awesome 2025-01-24 02:03 p.m.

Alright, no worries; it’ll be continuous, so y’all can just respond whenever you’re available, until we wrap up.

Deleted User 2025-01-24 02:04 p.m.

Yea, I figured it shouldn't be an issue

Awesome 2025-01-24 02:04 p.m.

Please make sure your witnesses, etc are ready, though.

cc: @JaroCycle

Deleted User

Yea, I figured it shouldn't be an issue

Awesome 2025-01-24 02:05 p.m.

Meant to reply to yours w/ the above.

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 02:05 p.m.

Currently waiting on their responses

Deleted User 2025-01-24 02:05 p.m.

I've got just my defendant who is gonna testify, and an expert

Deleted User 2025-01-24 02:05 p.m.

they're both good

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 02:12 p.m.

My expert isn't available, other lay witnesses will appear

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 02:12 p.m.

He will try (my expert) to appear but unsure of it

Awesome

Alright, no worries; it’ll be continuous, so y’all can just respond whenever you’re available, until we wrap up.

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 02:18 p.m.

We are doing it over discord?

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 02:18 p.m.

If yes, then I will have all my witnesses available,

JaroCycle

We are doing it over discord?

Awesome 2025-01-24 02:19 p.m.

Aff; there’s too many witnesses and exhibits for it to be in-game.

JaroCycle 2025-01-24 02:19 p.m.

Alright, great.

Awesome 2025-01-25 04:08 p.m.

@JaroCycle

@Deleted User

Are y’all here.

Awesome 2025-01-25 04:08 p.m.

Awesome

@JaroCycle

@Deleted User Are y’all here.

Deleted User 2025-01-25 04:17 p.m.

I have been at a house fire for the past three and a half hours

Deleted User 2025-01-25 04:17 p.m.

Gonna need to push to tomorrow

Deleted User

Gonna need to push to tomorrow

Awesome 2025-01-25 04:19 p.m.

Alright, tomorrow. Same time. Please ensure you’re there.

cc: @JaroCycle

JaroCycle 2025-01-25 04:20 p.m.

Alr

Awesome 2025-01-26 05:43 a.m.

Postponed until further notice, due to the resignation of JaroCycle from the Department of Justice.

cc: @Department of Justice / @Deleted User

(edited)

Awesome

Postponed until further notice, due to the resignation of JaroCycle from the Department of Justice. cc: @Department of Justice / @Deleted User(edited)

Deleted User 2025-01-26 07:26 a.m.

Dang, I scared them away

Deleted User

Dang, I scared them away

JaroCycle 2025-01-26 08:08 a.m.

No you did not

JaroCycle

No you did not

Deleted User 2025-01-26 08:09 a.m.

Sir you don’t work here no more

Deleted User 2025-01-26 08:09 a.m.

I’ll take a McDouble with a large fry

Awesome used

/remove

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-26 09:04 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has removed @JaroCycle from the case channel.

Deleted User 2025-01-26 02:13 p.m.

Here we go again. Not my client being subjected to an extended trial

@Awesome

Deleted User

Here we go again. Not my client being subjected to an extended trial @Awesome

Awesome 2025-01-26 05:28 p.m.

The delay is administrative and logistical in nature. Your client will be fine.

Awesome

The delay is administrative and logistical in nature. Your client will be fine.

Deleted User 2025-01-26 05:28 p.m.

I was making a joke

Deleted User

I was making a joke

Awesome 2025-01-26 05:29 p.m.

Kind of hard to tell, to be honest, especially given the recent activity in that area.

Awesome

Kind of hard to tell, to be honest, especially given the recent activity in that area.

Deleted User 2025-01-26 05:29 p.m.

That’s what I was referring to

Deleted User 2025-01-26 05:29 p.m.

It’s all good, discord jokes always land flat

Awesome used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-30 05:38 p.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @Reapers to the case channel.

Awesome 2025-01-30 05:38 p.m.

@Reapers

Deleted User 2025-01-30 05:40 p.m.

We still doing this upcoming Saturday

Reapers 2025-01-30 09:49 p.m.

@Awesome

Your honor, if trial for this matter is set for tomorrow, the state has no objections

Reapers 2025-01-30 09:50 p.m.

However, I can not guarantee the presence of any of the witnesses on the list(edited)

Reapers 2025-01-30 09:51 p.m.

even so, the state is ready to proceed forward nonetheless and does not want to inconvenience the court any longer

Reapers

@Awesome Your honor, if trial for this matter is set for tomorrow, the state has no objections

Awesome 2025-01-30 09:55 p.m.

It's not set for tomorrow.

Awesome

It's not set for tomorrow.

Reapers 2025-01-30 09:55 p.m.

Oh right, saturday?

Reapers

Oh right, saturday?

Awesome 2025-01-30 09:56 p.m.

No, I mean, I haven't rescheduled the matter yet.

Reapers 2025-01-30 09:57 p.m.

Either way, there will be no more delay on the state’s part, we are ready to move forward whenever the court wishes

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-30 10:03 p.m.

Case Modified

@krabz

has added @Nationgreat to the case channel.

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-01-30 10:03 p.m.

@Nationgreat

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-01-30 10:05 p.m.

Case Modified

@krabz

has added @Reapers to the case channel.

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-01-30 10:05 p.m.

@Reapers

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-01-30 10:05 p.m.

oops

krabzatonin ᴏᴍ 2025-01-30 10:05 p.m.

u already added

Awesome 2025-01-30 11:29 p.m.

Oops, didn't see your NOA @Nationgreat.

Awesome

Oops, didn't see your NOA @Nationgreat.

Nationgreat 2025-01-31 03:24 a.m.

Mixed had suggested to be the counsel of record for this case so I will only be a substitution in case he can't make it to the trial.

Nationgreat

Mixed had suggested to be the counsel of record for this case so I will only be a substitution in case he can't make it to the trial.

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:30 p.m.

Yall are putting an attorney with zero experience on a felony case?

Deleted User

Yall are putting an attorney with zero experience on a felony case?

Reapers 2025-01-31 12:33 p.m.

It sounds like you’re afraid and trying to back out once again like you did when you pawned off the case against your own university to the government

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:34 p.m.

This level of stupidity is exactly what I’m referring to. I can’t pawn off a case that, by statute, must be handled by SGO… sigh. Someone from DOJ come get their intern

Reapers 2025-01-31 12:35 p.m.

I’m not gonna respond to the inappropriate remark you just made, but I suggest you keep your attention on the facts of the case and not who’s handling it because that’s irrelevant here

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:36 p.m.

“I’m not gonna respond” … proceeds to respond

Deleted User

Yall are putting an attorney with zero experience on a felony case?

Nationgreat 2025-01-31 12:36 p.m.

DOJ currently has sort of a human resources deficit, I'm not a particularly experienced attorney either, but discussing staffing decisions isn't a subject appropriate for a case channel.

Nationgreat

DOJ currently has sort of a human resources deficit, I'm not a particularly experienced attorney either, but discussing staffing decisions isn't a subject appropriate for a case ch...

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:37 p.m.

It actually is. The State should be ensuring that competent counsel are handling their cases, which is why I raised my concern

Reapers 2025-01-31 12:44 p.m.

It’s none of your business who the state brings and as for your concern, I’m a certified member of the bar and and as far as competency goes, your lack of professionalism is showing and I find it funny you’re one to talk

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:45 p.m.

It’s entirely my business who the state lists as counsel, given their habitual practice of prolonging criminal cases and further neglecting them.

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:45 p.m.

If I must remind counsel, I have a duty to the interests of my client, not the ego of the State.

Reapers 2025-01-31 12:46 p.m.

Yeah, that’s not happening any longer which must be frustrating to you, but this is not the place to vent sir

Reapers 2025-01-31 12:46 p.m.

In fact, I’ve mentioned before that the state is ready to proceed whenever

Deleted User 2025-01-31 12:47 p.m.

The middle-school level gaslighting doesn’t work on me

Awesome 2025-01-31 01:07 p.m.

@Deleted User

@Reapers

Enough. Debates are welcome; heated arguments, however, are not.

Awesome

@Deleted User

@Reapers Enough. Debates are welcome; heated arguments, however, are not.

Reapers 2025-01-31 02:08 p.m.

Could we schedule this matter and proceed forward, your honor?

Reapers

Could we schedule this matter and proceed forward, your honor?

Awesome 2025-01-31 02:41 p.m.

I’ll reschedule it shortly.

steven2596 2025-02-05 12:25 p.m.

hey is there an update in this i been waiting since mid november(edited)

Deleted User 2025-02-05 12:25 p.m.

Currently waiting on scheduling

Awesome

I’ll reschedule it shortly.

Reapers 2025-02-05 12:47 p.m.

Reapers

Awesome 2025-02-05 07:41 p.m.

Apologies, does this Saturday work?

Deleted User 2025-02-05 08:11 p.m.

What time

Deleted User 2025-02-05 08:11 p.m.

in EST

steven2596 2025-02-05 09:12 p.m.

im working Saturday

steven2596 2025-02-05 09:12 p.m.

I'm off tomorrow and friday then i'm working till the 14th

Deleted User

in EST

Awesome 2025-02-06 12:39 a.m.

Ok, screw it. We’ll just do continuous trial on Saturday, and y’all can respond when you’re available.

Awesome 2025-02-06 12:39 a.m.

If the State is ready, that is. @Reapers

Awesome

Ok, screw it. We’ll just do continuous trial on Saturday, and y’all can respond when you’re available.

Reapers 2025-02-06 01:05 a.m.

What about the defendant saying he’s busy on Saturday?

Reapers

What about the defendant saying he’s busy on Saturday?

Awesome 2025-02-06 01:36 a.m.

It’s continuous, so he can respond to (and view) the proceedings whenever.

Awesome 2025-02-06 03:29 a.m.

If that works for everyone*

Deleted User 2025-02-06 05:20 a.m.

I’d prefer that

Awesome

It’s continuous, so he can respond to (and view) the proceedings whenever.

Reapers 2025-02-06 09:44 a.m.

Very well

Reapers 2025-02-06 09:44 a.m.

can the State’s witness be added to this channel so he may participate in the trial? His user is @dodged4abortions

Awesome used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-02-06 09:47 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @dodged4abortions to the case channel.

Deleted User 2025-02-06 09:48 a.m.

I believe I need my witness added too

Deleted User 2025-02-06 09:48 a.m.

@icant

Awesome used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-02-06 09:49 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @icant to the case channel.

Awesome 2025-02-06 09:49 a.m.

(Witnesses should not talk in this channel unless called upon when trial starts).

Toby 2025-02-06 11:20 a.m.

I will be present during this trial in a Clerk capacity to administer oaths.

Reapers 2025-02-07 02:12 p.m.

@Awesome

The state also requests that its second witness @okay_lil_buddy be added

Awesome used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-02-08 05:36 a.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @okay_lil_buddy to the case channel.

Awesome 2025-02-08 05:36 a.m.

We're going to start continuous trial shortly.

Awesome

We're going to start continuous trial shortly.

Deleted User 2025-02-08 05:31 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/jeopardy-theme-music-gif-23323909

Awesome 2025-02-09 05:34 a.m.

Alright. @Deleted User, @Reapers, @Nationgreat, are we all present?

Awesome 2025-02-09 05:35 a.m.

@Toby

@steven2596

Nationgreat 2025-02-09 05:35 a.m.

I am present.

Awesome 2025-02-09 05:37 a.m.

Once we’re all present, we’ll get under way.

Awesome

Alright. @Deleted User, @Reapers, @Nationgreat, are we all present?

Toby 2025-02-09 06:47 a.m.

Yeah

steven2596 2025-02-09 08:46 a.m.

Present

Deleted User 2025-02-09 08:47 a.m.

I’m present, not available until this afternoon, at church

Deleted User 2025-02-09 11:55 a.m.

Present

Reapers 2025-02-09 12:11 p.m.

I am here

Awesome 2025-02-09 12:17 p.m.

Alright. For the above-captioned matter, CR-0036-24, State of Mayflower v. StevenMedvedeva, the Court is now in session. The State may present its opening statement.

@Nationgreat @Reapers / @Deleted User // @Toby

Reapers 2025-02-09 12:54 p.m.

Your honor, the State has come here, on behalf of the people of Mayflower, to stop StevenMedvedeva from punishing our citizens for exercising their constitutional rights. The victim of this case was brutally attacked by a man using a bat, and this attack was lethal and could’ve resulted in the victim’s life. Fortunately, the victim was carrying a weapon on him, and he was able to use it to save his life. However, none of that mattered anyway, because the defendant strolled in what looks to be like not even a government issued car, and proceeded to shoot the victim dead without properly assessing the situation as what any law enforcement officer is expected to do. This case is not just a case about a police officer breaking his oath and shooting a victim dead when he should not have done so, it’s a case about upholding the constitution and protecting the second amendment of our nation.(edited)

Reapers 2025-02-09 12:56 p.m.

Prosecution rests, your honor. @Awesome

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:00 p.m.

Rests?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:00 p.m.

That's your entire case?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:00 p.m.

Okay, in that case

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:00 p.m.

I move for a directed verdict, your honor

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:01 p.m.

No I mean the opening statement, I’ve never done a discord trial so I’m not sure how to signal this

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:01 p.m.

Prosecution yields actually

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

Resting your case means you have finished the presentation of your evidence

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

There you go

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

"Thank you," or "we yield," would be the way to do it..

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

Alright, does the defense wish to present an opening statement?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

I for real got a chuckle out of tht

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

that

Awesome

Alright, does the defense wish to present an opening statement?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:02 p.m.

Yeah I'll keep it brief

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:13 p.m.

The State has frivolously charged Officer StevenMedvedeva with Voluntary Manslaughter. Their supposition, is that this officer wrongfully exercised lethal force against an individual who was actively discharging their shotgun at another person; which ultimately resulted in their death. They are attempting to suggest to this court that it should disregard decades of settled law on these types of matters, in order to advance an agenda of ostracizing keepers of the peace.

The State has not submitted any evidence, nor can they show, that Officer Medvedeva had any way of knowing the true intentions of the person who ultimately killed the bystander on the sidewalk. Ultimately, whether the original shooting was justified or not is not relevant. The State has the burden to prove that the Defendant acted unreasonably, or in disregard to their lawful duties. They cannot satisfy this burden.

We would reference one of many previous cases regarding these types of incidents, Anderson v. Russell 247 F.3d 125 (4th Cir. 2001);

"[the] evidence conclusively establishe[d] that [the officer] reasonably perceived" the Plaintiff was armed and that a "split-second decision to use deadly force against [the plaintiff] was reasonable in light of [the officer's] well-founded, though mistaken, belief that [the plaintiff] was reaching for a handgun. Thus, [the officer's] use of force does not constitute a Fourth Amendment violation."

This case has been cited roughly 214 times in preceding criminal cases.

The entirety of the presented exhibits supports only one logical conclusion. The officer witnessed an active shooting, and the eventual killing of another person; prompting them to take appropriate action. Thanks.

cc: @Awesome

@Reapers

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:17 p.m.

Alright. The State may call its first witness.

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:18 p.m.

@Reapers

@Nationgreat

/ @Deleted User // @Toby

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:20 p.m.

The State calls its first witness to the stand, Mr. Dima @dodged4abortions

Toby 2025-02-09 01:22 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Hello, would you like to take the religious or non-religous oath?

Toby

@dodged4abortions Hello, would you like to take the religious or non-religous oath?

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 01:24 p.m.

Your honor, non-religous oath(edited)

Toby 2025-02-09 01:26 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Do you affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

Toby

@dodged4abortions Do you affirm that you will tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth?

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 01:26 p.m.

yes.

Toby 2025-02-09 01:26 p.m.

Great, all yours @Reapers

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:27 p.m.

Can we pause for 10 minutes

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:28 p.m.

I gotta run a very quick errand and I wanna be able to object as needed

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:28 p.m.

Alright. We’ll recess for ten minutes.

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:28 p.m.

(I'm gonna be unavailable at 2 until 2:30 and then again at 4:30)(edited)

Awesome

Alright. We’ll recess for ten minutes.

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:43 p.m.

May I proceed with the witness?

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:49 p.m.

Are we good to resume? @Deleted User

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:49 p.m.

Yeah, I'm almost done with what I'm doing. I'd just ask to be given an opportunity to object before the witness answers

Deleted User

Yeah, I'm almost done with what I'm doing. I'd just ask to be given an opportunity to object before the witness answers

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:50 p.m.

Alright. You’ll have two minutes to object before the witness is allowed to answer.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:50 p.m.

That's fine with me

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:50 p.m.

@Reapers

Awesome

@Reapers

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:52 p.m.

I think it’s best if we just extend the recess to 2:30 in this case, tactical is not yet ready and I will be unavailable in 8 minutes so I might not have time to finish with the witness

Reapers

I think it’s best if we just extend the recess to 2:30 in this case, tactical is not yet ready and I will be unavailable in 8 minutes so I might not have time to finish with the wi...

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:52 p.m.

What’s your timezone?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:52 p.m.

I'm ready

Reapers

I think it’s best if we just extend the recess to 2:30 in this case, tactical is not yet ready and I will be unavailable in 8 minutes so I might not have time to finish with the wi...

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:53 p.m.

Actually, just proceed, and if we need to recess we can recess part-way through.

Awesome

What’s your timezone?

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:54 p.m.

EST

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:55 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Mr. Dima, you are a resident of the State and a witness in this incident, and you were the one who captured and submitted the video evidence in this case against StevenMedvedeva, correct?

Reapers

@dodged4abortions Mr. Dima, you are a resident of the State and a witness in this incident, and you were the one who captured and submitted the video evidence in this case agai...

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 01:56 p.m.

Yes.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:56 p.m.

I would note for counsel

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:56 p.m.

That's a compound question

dodged4abortions

Yes.

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:57 p.m.

Can you give 2 answers for the questions I asked for opposing counsel?

Reapers

@dodged4abortions Mr. Dima, you are a resident of the State and a witness in this incident, and you were the one who captured and submitted the video evidence in this case agai...

Awesome 2025-02-09 01:57 p.m.

Struck. Compound.

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:57 p.m.

Mr. Dima, you are a resident of Mayflower, correct?

Reapers

Mr. Dima, you are a resident of Mayflower, correct?

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 01:57 p.m.

Yes I am

Reapers 2025-02-09 01:58 p.m.

You are a witness in the incident which led us all here today, correct?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:58 p.m.

Objection, no foundation to the question

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:59 p.m.

Date? Reference?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 01:59 p.m.

Which incident?

Reapers

You are a witness in the incident which led us all here today, correct?

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 02:00 p.m.

Yes, I am.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:00 p.m.

this is gonna be a long trial

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:00 p.m.

I can already tell

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 02:00 p.m.

I'm sorry for response delays.

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:01 p.m.

The incident that happened on or about the 8th September of 2024 where law enforcement officer StevenMedvedeva shot and killed Mr. @okay_lil_buddy , correct?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:01 p.m.

There is a pending objection....

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:01 p.m.

why are you continuing to ask questions

Reapers

The incident that happened on or about the 8th September of 2024 where law enforcement officer StevenMedvedeva shot and killed Mr. @okay_lil_buddy , correct?

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 02:01 p.m.

Incorrect. I was the victim(edited)

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:01 p.m.

@Awesome

Your honor..

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:01 p.m.

Oh my lord

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:03 p.m.

Your honor, I apologize, I’m in a rush and I will not be able to continue until I’m back at 2:30

Deleted User

Objection, no foundation to the question

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:04 p.m.

Sustained, but on other grounds: it’s ambiguous. Counsel, stop asking questions when there’s a pending objection.

Reapers

Your honor, I apologize, I’m in a rush and I will not be able to continue until I’m back at 2:30

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:05 p.m.

Ok. We’ll recess until 2:30 EST.

Reapers

The incident that happened on or about the 8th September of 2024 where law enforcement officer StevenMedvedeva shot and killed Mr. @okay_lil_buddy , correct?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:05 p.m.

Just for the record, we object to this question as well

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:05 p.m.

but I figured the court assumed that as well

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:05 p.m.

@Awesome

Reapers

The incident that happened on or about the 8th September of 2024 where law enforcement officer StevenMedvedeva shot and killed Mr. @okay_lil_buddy , correct?

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:06 p.m.

Struck.

Awesome

Struck.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:07 p.m.

Awesome

Ok. We’ll recess until 2:30 EST.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:07 p.m.

Can the court re-ping at 2:30 to resume, please

Deleted User

Can the court re-ping at 2:30 to resume, please

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:07 p.m.

Sure.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:07 p.m.

Thanks

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:30 p.m.

Are we ready to resume?

@Reapers @Nationgreat / @Deleted User

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:30 p.m.

Nationgreat 2025-02-09 02:32 p.m.

I'm present but I will only take over in case Mixed is unavailable to continue.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:32 p.m.

Supposedly he was coming back

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:32 p.m.

@Reapers

awake?

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:36 p.m.

I am here now

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:36 p.m.

Wonderful

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:37 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Mr. Dima, you are the victim in the incident that happened on the 8th September of 2024, correct?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:37 p.m.

Objection

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:38 p.m.

Leading

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:38 p.m.

Sustained.

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:39 p.m.

Your Honor, may I present exhibit A to the victim?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:39 p.m.

You haven't established

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:39 p.m.

the witnesses relevance to the case yet

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:40 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Mr. Dima, can you state for the record why you have been called to testify today?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:40 p.m.

Objection, calls for a narrative

Reapers

@dodged4abortions Mr. Dima, can you state for the record why you have been called to testify today?

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:41 p.m.

Counsel, where are you going with this?

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:42 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Please state for the record what were you doing at the scene of the incident that happened on the 8th September of 2024

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:42 p.m.

Objection, again..

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:42 p.m.

You haven't established he was there

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:43 p.m.

Sustained. No foundation.

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:43 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Were you at the scene of the incident that happened on the 8th September of 2024?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:43 p.m.

Mmmmmmmmmmm

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:43 p.m.

Objection

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:43 p.m.

What incident?

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:44 p.m.

The incident where Mr. StevenMedvedeva allegedly shot and killed @dodged4abortions on the 8th of September

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:44 p.m.

Now counsel is testifying

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:45 p.m.

I'm gonna give you a hint

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:45 p.m.

You filed discovery with a list of names on it

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:45 p.m.

let's start with that

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:45 p.m.

Your Honor, he asked for me to precise the incident and I did

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:45 p.m.

It was rhetorical

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:46 p.m.

Your honor, if counsel can't establish a foundation to begin asking questions to this witness, I'm gonna ask that he be excused. @Awesome

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:46 p.m.

@Awesome

Prosecution requests to show exhibit A to witness @dodged4abortions

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:46 p.m.

We object

Awesome used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-02-09 02:46 p.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @Nicklaus to the case channel.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:46 p.m.

You haven't established a foundation to ask him questions

BotclerkFlow

Click to see command.

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:46 p.m.

Please file a NOA. @Nicklaus

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:47 p.m.

The Solicitor General is prosecuting a case?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:47 p.m.

Is that even allowed

Awesome

Please file a NOA. @Nicklaus

Nicklaus 2025-02-09 02:47 p.m.

can I do verbally. I’m not on pc

Reapers

@Awesome Prosecution requests to show exhibit A to witness @dodged4abortions

Reapers 2025-02-09 02:47 p.m.

Can we get a ruling on this? @Awesome

Nicklaus

can I do verbally. I’m not on pc

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:47 p.m.

Sure.

Deleted User

Is that even allowed

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:48 p.m.

He’s counsel for the State; what matters he may appear in are determined by DOJ regulations, as far as I’m aware.

Nicklaus 2025-02-09 02:48 p.m.

Please take notice that Nicklaus_s, Solicitor General, appears in this matter as counsel for Plaintiff State of Mayflower.

Awesome

He’s counsel for the State; what matters he may appear in are determined by DOJ regulations, as far as I’m aware.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

I'm trying to review the state code, but I think you're right

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

It seems mildly odd, but I'm happy to get this thing moving

Deleted User

It seems mildly odd, but I'm happy to get this thing moving

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

Indeed.

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

Anyways, let’s get back on track.

Nicklaus 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

We will withdraw all pending questions

Nicklaus 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

May we recess for 5 minutes

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:49 p.m.

Granted.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:50 p.m.

Just for clarification

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:50 p.m.

is the Solicitor General now the first chair in this prosecution, co counsel, divine intervention, psychic interpretation for Mr. Reaper, and/or an emotional support therapist?(edited)

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:50 p.m.

just trying to clarify the court record

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:57 p.m.

@Awesome

@Nicklaus

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:57 p.m.

we ready?

Awesome 2025-02-09 02:57 p.m.

I am. Not sure if the State is.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 02:58 p.m.

@Nicklaus

I'm amendable to the State dropping the charges

Reapers 2025-02-09 03:01 p.m.

@dodged4abortions

Were you ingame at Clark County on the 8th of September of 2024?

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:01 p.m.

I'm confused

Awesome 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

So am I.

Reapers 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

I'm still counsel of record here and still first chair

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

Then-

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

wa-

Reapers

@dodged4abortions Were you ingame at Clark County on the 8th of September of 2024?

dodged4abortions 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

No, I wasn't, this incident happened on 8th nov. of 2024. Sorry for not stating this earlier.(edited)

Awesome 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

throws legal papers into the air in frustration

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:02 p.m.

https://tenor.com/view/throwing-papers-im-done-nope-not-today-sheldon-gif-5610220

Paper Throwing Sheldon

Awesome 2025-02-09 03:03 p.m.

We’re adjourned until the State sorts out whatever this is.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:03 p.m.

@Awesome

Can I move for a mistrial

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:03 p.m.

or is that too much of a clown on this guy

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:06 p.m.

We officially move for a mistrial, citing prosecutorial incompetence.

I'd also note that Mr. Reaper has been placed on Administrative Leave within the Department of Justice.

Lastly, I will be contacting the State Bar Association to file an ethics complaint.

cc: @Awesome

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:19 p.m.

@Awesome

Deleted User

We officially move for a mistrial, citing prosecutorial incompetence. I'd also note that Mr. Reaper has been placed on Administrative Leave within the Department of Justice. La...

Awesome 2025-02-09 03:20 p.m.

I’ll wait for the State’s response.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:20 p.m.

Welllllll

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:20 p.m.

The state is currently on a trip to DOJ gulag

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:20 p.m.

@Nicklaus

you’re up

Awesome used

/add

clerkFlow Bot2025-02-09 03:22 p.m.

Case Modified

@Awesome

has added @ryan to the case channel.

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:22 p.m.

Hi we'll consent to a mistrial with the court noting that this was done with the consent of the defense too

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:22 p.m.

That means we'll retry him

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

How about this

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

If the state is ready to proceed

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

WITH COMPETENT COUNSEL

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

Counsel

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

You wanted a mistrial

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

We've consented

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

then I’ll just note the glaring negligence

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

That's that

HolyRomanRyan

We've consented

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

I didn’t know they were going to supply competent counsel

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

A do over will be good for all

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

I’m ready to proceed, I’ll withdraw my motion

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:23 p.m.

I am not particularly familiar so id need time anyway

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

@Awesome

Awesome 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

Well, ok.. then.

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

I’ll object then

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

The state has gone through

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

Okay what do you want

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

Three prosecutors

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

Yes

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

So mistrial

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

U wanted it

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

I’m asking for a dismissal

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

Actually

Deleted User 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

Not a mistrial

HolyRomanRyan 2025-02-09 03:24 p.m.

We'd like a proper pdf