JaroCycle 2025-01-03 07:04 a.m.Exhibit G - Is a picture taken from the original video, simply to highlit where the defendant was at the beginning of the whole interaction that took place at mersea car delear. It is not edited, nor does put the defendant in a wrong light, it is put there to allow better analises of the whole video, which is presented in the Exhibit A. And per the best evidence, the original is in fact provided, which makes the whole objection without basis, as like I said this is only to allow better view on the situation, and the highlighting where the defendant was when the situation on Exhibit A begins.
Exhibit H - Same as Exhibit G, it only highlights the moment of the entire situation, where the defendant is, and serves to support the claim, of where the defendant was, and that he could in fact see the entire situation, before making the decisions that led to a tragic death. Like I mentioned regarding Exhibit G, the entire video is presented in Exhibit A, and exhibit H serves as a highlight to allow better presentation of facts that are already stated and accepted by both sides.
Exhibit I - This is a picture taken by the investigator, to show the view of the defendant that he has while entering the area, in which the scene presented in Exhibit A takes place. It's absurd to object to this with the best evidence rule, considering this is entire pov of the investigator, and literally is not editited nor tampered with in any way. Again, this exhibit will be backed up by the expert witness statement, and other lay witnesses, so to object to this as to best evidence has absolutely no grounds.
Exhibit K - Again this is a picture taken by the investigator, to show the possible POV of the defendant, when the situation takes place, and this is relevant to the case, as to proof whether the defendant could see the entire situation that took prior to his decision to shoot the victim, and will be further supported by witness statements.
CC: @Awesome